IAT Resistor Mods vs Performance Modules vs Real Chips

What are those infamous IAT resistor mods and performance modules and how do they compare with real EPROM racing or performance chips? Need a guide to try it out by your self? Find out here…

Some background

Modern cars no longer use carburetors. Instead, they use a system called electronic fuel injection (efi) and it is controlled by an onboard computer called the ECM or Engine Control Module. The efi, replaces the carburetor job entirely. It does it by sensing environment variables such as atmospheric pressure, temperature, altitude, air density and many other variables for precise metering and injecting the needed fuel, according to its calculations. The ECM is able to do such a gigantic job by executing a software program created for that purpose, which is called and executed every time the engine is started.

The EFI software (program) has parameters written on it, like injection and ignition tables, speed limiters and many more things. Such parameters are the ones modified when using an EPROM chip, looking for more power output from the engine, like a more aggressive ignition table to take advantage of higher octane gas, or for accommodating hardware upgrades, like correcting the speedometer when using larger rims.

In some older models (up to 1995), the memory used to accommodate things like fuel and ignition tables in a removable EPROM chip. This EPROM chip is the part which is often replaced by another EPROM chip, already containing a modified copy of the ECM program. Vy the way, people modifying these programs, since it deals with the engine management system, they must know what they are doing or otherwise, the engine can be severely damaged by the modification done.

Changes made in a EPROM performance chip are done with a software for that exact purpose.

IAT Modification scams

IAT Sensor = “Intake Air Temperature” sensor. Some guys out there are selling fake “performance chips”, where they use obscure and not proven methods for “fooling” the engine ECM into “thinking” that incoming air is cold enough, as to make the ECM to increase the amount of fuel being injected to the engine in an attempt to compensate for such a “temperature change”. Since they are only using a simple resistor in their fooling attempt, they are disguising it inside a fancy box with fancy labels with two to four cables coming out of it. Not only they are fooling people into making them think it is some sophisticated chip or module, but are also claiming huge power gains which are simply impossible. Have you seen the famous +20HP? Tje “+20hp” was one of the most famous terms several years back according to Google searches. Now they changed to +30HP, +50HP, +90HP and so on. I need to say, without the intention to offend, that anyone buying a “module” with four wires for around $50.00 because it was advertised as a +50HP or more, I wouldn’t blame the seller. I would blame the buyer for biting such a foolish bait.

More and more people that have bought those IAT modifications are claiming that it does nothing. It is probably attributed to the fact that not all cars depend only on the IAT sensors alone to make the predicted changes. So it is very probable that modifying the IAT sensor of your car will do nothing, or at least nothing that you could notice.

Why trying to foolish the ECM into thinking that incoming air is cold? Because cold air is denser, which means, more oxygen. More oxygen will allow more fuel to be burned at the same time, making more power. Ever wonder why your car moves better at nights or in cold weather? Exactly, more oxygen! (unless you live in a high altitude area) But guess what? If you fool your ECM like that, it may inject more fuel, but there will not really be more oxygen. The mixture will end up being more rich, more harmful emissions will be present, but not necessarily more power.

You may also replace the IAT with a variable setup if you wish to adjust values on the fly:

Still more, if you live in a cold area, you will notice no difference as the original IAT sensor installed in your car will already be in a better resistance value than the one you would insert. On the other hand, if you live in a hot or high altitude area even less oxygen will be available for combustion.

Example of the garbage being sold online as “chips” or as “modules”

What can you expect from a real EPROM chip correctly modified?

When an aftermarket EPROM chip is installed in your carโ€™s ECU, if it was correctly modified, you should experience a boost in engine power and torque, more driveability at all and of course, it should accommodate the changes in hardware you wanted it for. If it is done right, you simply will not want to drive your car without it ever again.

What can you expect from an IAT “performance Module”?

This is simple. Other than feeling robbed or foolish for trashing money, you may expect nothing.

Want to try yourself the IAT “modification” without spending in those $30.00-$70.00 modules?

Sure. We can help on that to. Just follow this guide:

First of all, the IAT sensor is the Intake Air Temperature sensor, so as the name implies, it senses temperature. I does it by using a variable resistor which is sensitive to temperature and it has a negative coefficient in relationship with temperature and resistance. That is, the higher the temperature, the lower the resistance. So, if we want to decrease the temperature value read by the ECM, we will need to increase the resistance value. How we do that? Simple, we put a resistor of certain value in series with the IAT sensor. Since resistance in series will add up, the total resistance value will still vary with temperature, but the lowest values will be higher than the resistor value we will insert. This will ensure a specific minimum value. In other words, it will not allow the value to fall under the level we want. That way, it will not hit the low resistance levels that the ECM interprets as hot air. As you can see, a resistance in series with the IAT will not disable it, but modify its operating range.

A typical resistance value widely used is 4.7k (4700 ohms), but if you wish to be near to the exact value for your car model, you will need to take out the IAT sensor from your car, put it in a glass with ice, wait for a couple of minutes and then with an ohmmeter, measure the resistance given by the sensor at that freezing temperature and write down the value. Now you will need to find a resistor with the closest value to the resistance you measured from the sensor while cold. Just match to the closest value available commercially. For example; 1K, 1.2K, 1.5K, 1.8K, 2.2K, 2.7K, 3.3K, 3.9K and many more.

Below is an example of a 4700 ohm resistor. Color bands must be YELLOW-VIOLET-RED. The fourth ring can be GOLD for 5% tolerance.

If you can not put your IAT sensor in a glass of water because the sensor’s design does not allow it, like for example, if it is embedded in the MAF or flowmeter, then you may use a spray which is normally used to cool down electronic components when troubleshooting a heat problem. It is commercially available under different names. Examples are below:

If the IAT is embedded in the MAF sensor, take out the MAF sensor and identify which component of the assembly is the IAT. Then spray it directly to cool it down to freezing temperatures, then take the measurement.

What other users are looking for:

[do u plug the sensor back in when doing the resistor mod]  [manipulasi sensor o2 dengan resistor]  [looking for a small iat sensor that for diy]  [MAF resistor modd for fors focus wire diagram]  [maf sensor mod]  

You may also like...

141 Responses

  1. admin says:

    I often see questions and search engines results, stating “are performance chip just resistors?”. In this post you will find out that the answer is -no-. Real sellers sell real chips and then, there are the other ones.

    Sometimes, “Performance Chips” is just a nice name that some people put on an item for successfully selling it.

    Imagine someone trying to sell a “racing resistor”.

    A lot of people get disappointed when they pay some amount of money and are excited when it finally arrives to their mail box, only to find out that they have been “ripped off” with a nice box with a resistor inside.

    I personally bought one once from an online store and it didn’t even was enclosed in a box. It was a simple resistor in an envelope, with a very hard to read black and white blurred instructions sheet… well, you can imagine what an unpleasant feeling it was and how angry I became with my self…

    I personally run an eBay store and offer real chips. At the moment we have only several chips and services, but we are expanding step by step. You may ask any question you have about any of the items or services on the store.


  2. Frank Montero says:

    Hey thanks for the info! You saved me some money. I was about to buy one of those “modules” when I found your article.



  3. admin says:

    I have also seen questions like: “is it safe to put an ait sensor module in your car”

    The answer is yes. Trying it won’t hurt your ecu or engine. There is no too low or too high of a resistance value that will hurt any of both. Just avoid shorting the connector with other sources like ground or + battery terminal.

  4. ramy says:

    hello i bought a “performance modules” it is cost me 120 dollars and a time i break and only had a f**k it resistor of 1 cent dont buy that peace of s**t much better go to radio sack and buy a 5 resistor by a dollar and its work the same ok bye

  5. admin says:

    Yes. That is the result that is often obtained from those “modules”. Just take a look inside that box and you will see the sophisticated circuit of just one resistor…

  6. Arten Rozorf says:

    Thanks for the info, works great!

  7. Lisabetta says:

    Love the advice. Thank you.

  8. Serena says:

    Thank you for sharing. I came to this site to read how things really are

  9. admin says:

    We will post soon a follow up of this info, based on requests made by visitors. Just use the search at the top of this page to check if it is available yet.
    (search for IAT, etc.)

    Thanks to you all for reading.


  10. Louis Penn says:

    Man I did it myself and didnt worked no matter what value in ohms i used. These guys at ebay selling resistor for a lot of bucks r some clowns. poor them who buy from them.

  11. admin says:

    I am glad this information is helping people to not get into a scam.

    By the way, the additional information was already published at:


  12. J says:

    has anyone tried a resistor in a Honda civic

  13. mehmet ozcan says:

    2007 vw caddy tdฤฑ resistor what ohm ???

  14. MEHMEY says:


  15. admin says:

    Hello Mehmet. Resistance of most VW’s IAT run considerably lower then other makes. It is as follows:

    86F(30C) – 1.5k – 2K
    104F(40C) – 1K – 1.5K
    122F(50C) – .8K – 1K
    140F(60C) – .5K – .7K
    158F(70C) – .3K – .5K
    176F (80C) – .27K – .37K
    194F (90C) – .22K – .27K

    All values are in K-ohms (x1000 ohms), so for example, 1.5K = 1500 ohms and .27K = 270 ohms.

    Good luck.

  16. admin says:

    Hello J.

    I hope someone that have tested it on a Civic can post his or her experience here. Myself, i haven’t tried on Civic, as I use chips for Civic (if it’s OBD-I), but tested on Mazda Protege, Hyundai Scoop and Accent, GM Cavalier and Ford Taurus, among some others and haven’t noticed anything.

    But of course, as i said, it will be nice if others post their experience.

  17. MEHMET ร–ZCAN says:

    OHM ???

  18. admin says:

    Mehmet, you may look at the information in the table for VW above. If I was doing it for a VW, I would use 2.2K-Ohms for simulating colder than 86F(30C). The color code would be -red,red,red,gold.

  19. nikolas says:

    I was told you can connect a 20 k adjustable resistor pot in parallel to the original car IAT to retard the timing is it true?
    I am running hho(hydrogen)and I want to retard the timing.

  20. admin says:

    Hello Nikolas. If your car is one of the models that ONLY take the IAT sensor input to make changes, AND, those changes made are in both the fuel and timing areas, then yes, an adjustable or any other resistor in PARALLEL with the IAT (with the IAT in the circuit, NOT disconnected), will make the resistance value to go down, making the ECU “think” that the incoming air is hotter, lowering the fuel being injected and retarding ignition (in fact, not retarding, but advancing less than normal) in an attempt to avoid detonations that would happen if the temperature would be truly hot.

    You will also feel a loss in power due to that, so if you feel the loss, then the resistor is doing the job.

    The fact that it is an adjustable resistor (potentiometer or just “pot”), you can play with it to bring it to different resistance values. The lower the total resistance in the circuit, the less advance it should apply.

    As for the potentiometer, I think that using 20K for that purpose is in the right track, since that value would cover 99.9% of the values presented in an IAT sensor.

    As a final comment, as you mentioned that are using HHO, please note that as noted above, the fuel injected will also be less. I mention that just in case you are counting on the actual fuel supply and haven’t consider a variation (injection).

    Best regards and Good luck.

  21. Leo says:

    what about those modules connectting to the obd port? cuz im looking at one right now well actually still because you went into great detail of replacing your ecu or (not) gettin a iat resistor online but wat about the obd port mods?

  22. admin says:

    Well, if you refer to modules like the one offered by Superchips, for example (Micro Tuner), they do work as they are a completely different approach. Instead of being a plain resistor, they are complete hand-held micro computers, each one programmed for specific cars.

    Those modules are a real solution for performance, but are a bit expensive ($200 – $500)

    They connect to the ecu through the OBD-II (diagnostic) port and reprogram (flash) the internal memory, inserting a performance program. It will be the same as installing a performance chip in your ecu, with the exception that such modules often offer a menu with different performance levels to choose from.

    It is done through the diagnostic port because most 1996 and newer vehicles did not come with a replaceable chip on their circuits. Instead, it is re-written this way.

    With those modules, still assuming we are talking about the same modules, performance varies from manufacturer to manufacturer. One good thing is that it stores in memory the original contents of your ecu, in case you wish to go back to stock mode. You may go from performance to stock and back as many times you wish, as long as it is used in your vehicle.

    Once you connect it to your vehicle and perform the first programming, the VIN number or any other code is automatically stored on the device for it to identify your vehicle.

    If the modules I described are not the ones you refer to, just reply to this thread with details so I can help you better.



  23. Dante says:

    simple things i have a 1.4 honda civic 98 with 75HP’s from its mother i did those modifications :

    i have a cold air intake + 6-10HP
    final exaust system + 3-7HP
    iridium sparks +1-2 HP
    IAT sensore RESISTOR makes the cold air intake’s gain +2-4 HP to the excisting values
    2 neodmium magnets + 2-4 HP’s(ionizers)
    now my car is 97 HP’s tested ! i don’t need to reprogramm my ECU because i gained 22 HP’s without touching it.!!!

    one more thing DO you know that the Catalysts in all cars REDUSES the Horsepower from 6-10 HP’s ??? if u have the money go buy aftermarket ‘racing’ and you’ll see the diffirence

  24. admin says:

    Well, I’m glad you obtained all that extra power without even reprogramming the ecu. It would be nice to look at the Dyno charts before and after the mods.

    I guess you have the charts, since you stated that gains were tested. Also, are the mentioned gains in BHP (engine) or WHP (wheels)? Not contradicting you, I just would love to know the details. That way, more people can take advantage of the tricks.

    As you mentioned, your car is 1.4L, so I guess it is a Diesel model. Since this website is mainly oriented to gasoline models, I can not comment on this and will be open for discussion for Diesel savvy people.

    Thank you very much for your comments.

    Best regards,


  25. Dante says:

    No it isn’t diesel is gazoline and is only 1.4 lt . this model is from germany and i live in greece i don’t have the dyno test but the 97HPs (96,73) exactly are true i tested on my friends dynamometer and is WHP not BHP.
    i can only tell u this from stop 600 meters race with a VW polo 2000 1.4lt with 101HPs from its mother- i am 2 cars ahead and i tested at least 3-4 times before the modifications i was 2 cars back.
    as for the details
    i will inform you soon when i make the details ๐Ÿ™‚ thanx

  26. admin says:

    Nice! About the cold air intake, as you may know by now, the cooler, the best. If using a metal runner on the ram air intake, it will work even better if you insulate it with a heat resistant material like that used on air conditioners that is made of foil and glass fiber. The less heat the runner absorbs from the engine, the cooler the air will enter the engine and since cooler air has more oxygen concentration, will turn in even more power!

    I know, not too aesthetic as a chrome metal runner, but will perform better.

    Will look forward for the info. Thanks for sharing it!

    Best regards,


  27. toosavvy says:

    So then: These ‘2cent’ resistors will(not:-[) work on a Diesel?
    Not aware that similar criteria applied to CompIgn fuelling… Live & Learn :<)

  28. Friendly Guy says:

    Hi all,

    I have bought a “Performance Chip” (it is a box with 2 wires coming out – look like there is only a resistor inside) on EBAY with the price of $24.99 and it is wonderful. My car is running smoother and faster, look like it is gaining horse power too. I really love it. Here is the one that I bought:


    If you don’t know how to connect, ask the seller (send him an email and he will answer within 48 hours)

    The only thing I has changed from instruction that instead using the clip to connect the wires, I sliced out the wires and connecting them to make sure that they have a good contacts with each other. PERFECT.

  29. admin says:

    Hello Friendly Guy. It is good that you bring this to discussion here. The product you describe is exactly that, a simple resistor inside a box.

    Sellers are just learning about that scam and repeating it again and again. As long as there are people buying their lies, they will continue doing this.

    Could you imagine? Not enough with the extra horsepower scam, now they add that it will save fuel!!!. How in the world can it save fuel if it is injecting more fuel in the case that it would work???

    I am an Electronics / Automotive technician and I posted here the truth about those resistors scams so people have the opportunity to make the right choice between the reality and being scammed.

    No offense, and if you feel it works, nice for you, but sure you haven’t tried a real chip or a real tuning.

    From the same seller, here are some people that think different than you do, just to list a few. This was taken from his feedback history and the common answer from him to all those buyers is “you did an incorrect install”

    It is part the buyer and part the people that keep sponsoring such actions by buying his fake products. It make it seems like performance doesn’t matter any more, but how much they lie and how good the fake product looks, which will boost the placebo effect.



    FEEDBACK: Item never left your store.Confirmed by USPS.Lied about shipping it 2 times.Poor

    FEEDBACK: Item simply not peformaned as advertised, Other feedback implies mine is not odd

    FEEDBACK: got no change in hp,worked with cus. ser. & still no change.inst. rite 2!

    FEEDBACK: e mailed sellerto ask for wiring digram no response tryed three times.

    FEEDBACK: the company knows the device may not work on all vehicles as advertised. bummer

    FEEDBACK: no mpg +, slight performance +,21 days, engine missing,stalling,device removed

    FEEDBACK: never got my item ,seller woul not responds false tracking number

    FEEDBACK: It did’t work in my car I still have it instald and I still hevent seen a change

    FEEDBACK: fast shipping/answered questions/product does not work for our car/can return
    Follow-up – beware of this seller/false nonpayment strikes if not 100% positive feedback!!!!

    FEEDBACK: fast shipping just havent notice any power gain yet maybe to early????

    FEEDBACK: Doesnt do what they claim, even after I hooked it up right

    FEEDBACK: doesn’t do anything special

    FEEDBACK: The delivery was good and quick, but the installations manual was not good.

    Follow-up – aviod this seller. car NOT modified. seller makes false claims about no paymnt

    FEEDBACK: Chip is a ripoff there is nothing in the box couln’t get to work so i checked
    ITEM: #1 PERFORMANCE CHIP FORD EXPLORER 1991-2009 2004 2003

    FEEDBACK: did’nt work on my other truck, Wnot waste the time installing it on this one

    FEEDBACK: Opened it up, 2 wires connected to a resistor, 25ยข item for $25, total crap

    FEEDBACK: SHENANIGANS – a secret, dishonest activity or maneuvering

    FEEDBACK: tried all the suggestions cannot tell any difference with or without it!

    FEEDBACK: fast shipping, but what I paid for was a product that just simply did not work

    FEEDBACK: no power or mpg gain at all

    FEEDBACK: I have not noticed anything after putting this chip on my car.

    FEEDBACK: I have had no real hp gains or noticed any help for my fuel economy?

    FEEDBACK: item sucks. had for two weeks and still nothing. garbage!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    FEEDBACK: it did nothing they said it would do, no horsepower gains and no mpg increase

    FEEDBACK: this gas saver is a joke! its only a wire in a plastic box! you get what you pai

    FEEDBACK: didnt really make a diffrence

    FEEDBACK: Fraudulent product; No Difference on my truck

    FEEDBACK: installed..no change, just a couple of wires..shipped fast, just no performance.



    FEEDBACK: All hooked up, correct ! dont feel any performance gains as yet, we will see…

    FEEDBACK: Took seller 4 weeks to refund my money so i can revise my feedback…

    FEEDBACK: Biggest ebay scam ever. Open it up and look inside people!

  30. Friendly Guy says:

    Hi Admin,

    I have an Lexus 2003 ES300 and it was a little weak before when trying to accelerate from a stop or in motion. The mileage on my car before was about 17mpg in the city and around 30 mpg in the highway. Since I would like my car to be a little faster and I saw the seller has a lot of good feedback (almost 100% at the time I bought the device 2 months ago) so I would like to give my car a try. It works, however, the mileage is now look like fixed at 20-22 mpg even in the city or highway and I have not been driving far on the trip like several hundred miles so I did not know if the mileage will improve, but so far I can see that my car is quicker and faster but I don’t know if it will cause any air pollution since as you have said it pumps more gas to the engine. Thanks.

  31. Friendly Guy says:

    Hi Admin again,

    Do you know where can I buy the Real Chip for my 2003 Lexus ES300 so I can take out the Mod Performance Chip that I bought on EBAY?

    I have been looking for the Real CHIP before but I did not see anywhere selling it.

    The city I live now (San Jose, CA) is having too much traffic and people are driving a little fast so it is a little scare when my car can not going a little faster.


  32. admin says:

    Thanks for your comments and contributing to the topic. I really appreciate it.

    By the way, in your case, that you had a positive experience, I guess that you may use the information on this page to maybe try to do a “fine tuning” by trying different resistance values.

    The values for the 2003 ES300 are:

    -4F (-20C) = 13,600 – 18,400 Ohms.
    -68F (20C) = 2,210 – 2,690 Ohms.
    -140F (60C) = 493 – 667 Ohms.

    That way, serving to the purpose of this article, if someone is to benefit from this, he or she can do it for free, or at least for the very small cost of a resistor (without the box which only purpose is for disguising/making attractive).

    By the way, on this model, the IAT is embedded inside the 5-Connector MAF sensor, wired to #4 (BLUE w/ BLACK) and #5 (BROWN).

    Best regards,


  33. Friendly Guy says:

    Hi Richard,

    Wow, you are the man. You even know the wires color code for the ITA.

    When I received the device from EBAY and I was very confusing so I have to take a photo of my ITA connectors + wires and sent to the seller and asking him which ones I should connect. After 2 days, he sent me the instruction on the wires you just told.

    I will do like you said for the FINE tuning this weekend and I will come back here later (may be 2 weeks since my car ECU need to learn for several days before I can see the differences).

    I really appreciate your time & your help. Your Web Site is so wonderful – a lot of knowledge on car stuffs.

  34. Hi, gr8 post thanks for posting. Information is useful!

  35. CrisBetewsky says:

    Hello! Thanks for the post. It is really amazing! I will definitely share it with my friends.

  36. Vick says:

    Hi guys, I was also a victim of that named chips.. Of course it does not worked..! ๐Ÿ™‚ but..! It took of my check engine light on my 1998 Olds LSS 3.8L! wow hahahahahah ๐Ÿ˜€ I do not know why/how but it did.. I looked inside and ” hello 4.7K resistor !” ๐Ÿ™‚
    So.. do you know what are the values for this car ? I just want to test it, and of course I can afford myself THE 10 cent VALUE OF A RESISTOR ! hahahah ๐Ÿ™‚


  37. admin says:

    Hello Vick.

    Thanks for reading. Just spread the word so this stops happening and enriching those scammers.

    About the 1998 Oldsmobile LSS, the values are as follows:

    Temperature ———– Resistance
    212F (100C)………….177 Ohms
    194F ( 90C)…………..241 Ohms
    158F ( 70C)…………..467 Ohms
    122F ( 50C)…………..973 Ohms
    104F ( 40C)………….1459 Ohms
    86F ( 30C)………….2238 Ohms
    68F ( 20C)………….3520 Ohms
    50F ( 10C)………….5670 Ohms

    As you can see, 4.7K (4700 Ohms) is supposed to be a good value in theory, which is between 68F-50F, but of course it is a complete scam.



  38. Richard says:

    good READ!!!

  39. ElectroGeek says:

    What would be the optimal IAT resistance values for a 2003 Infiniti G35 Sedan? I have heard of people using resistors with a value as high as 100k ohm. Does it matter if the resistor is 1/4 or 1/2 watt? Thanks!

  40. admin says:

    Hello ElectroGeek.

    Thanks for your message.

    Resistors can be 1/4 watt as the signal passing through it is a 5V signal. So if you are using 4.7K for example, current = E/R = 5/4700 = 1.1mA, then, Power = E x I = 1.1mA x 5 = .0055 watts or 5.5mW. That means that 1/4w (.25w) or even 1/8w (.125w) is way more than enough.

    About the values for the 2003 Infiniti G35, we have in record only two values and looking at them, it will be obvious that 100K is way out of range. The values are as follows:

    77F (25C) = 2.1K
    176F (80C) = .37K (370 Ohms)

    So for less temperature than 77F(25C), just raise the resistance value, maybe up to 3.3K, 3.9K or 4.7K which are already available and common resistance values.



  41. Stan says:

    2002 Toyota Highlander 3.0L 2WD Basic (1M) 1.)IAT is part of MAS so what are the 2 wire colors and resistor value I should use in FL?
    Current MPG ave. 22-24. 2.)Have OEM coldbox with K&N…what can I use to increase cold air flow into this OEM box? Thanks much.

  42. admin says:

    Hello Stan.

    Yes, the IAT is embedded in the MAF sensor on the 2002 Toyota Highlander 3.0L.

    It has 5 wires and the IAT is wired between #4 (Red/Yellow) and #5 (White). In this case, #4, which is the IAT itself, must be disconnected from the MAF and connected to one lead of the resistor. The other resistor lead goes to #5, without disconnecting it from the MAF.

    About values, they are the following:

    -4F (-20C) = 18.4K
    68F (20C) = 2.2K
    140F (60C) = .667K (667 Ohms)

    Thanks for reading,



  43. Stan says:

    Thanks Richard….wrt throttle body spacers…is there one that fits my 2002 Highlander intake; and, if yes, what is the part number? Thanks much.

  44. admin says:

    I am sorry Stan, but I can not advice on that as I don’t have that information.

    What I can tell, is that I would save my money instead of buying a throttle body spacer, since the original idea, whichever it was, was meant for carburated and TBI (Throttle-Body-Injection) engines, on which, the spacer was in between the air/fuel mixture and the intake manifold.

    On today’s cars (based on your 2002 vehicle), the injection is done in a point farther below the throttle, making the spacer due changes (if any) only on the incoming air instead of on the air/fuel mixture.

    Of course, other physics factors not considered at this moment may apply here, so if you end up doing the modification anyway and get any improvement (tested) on saving or performance, it would be very nice if you share it here with us, so we all can benefit from the power of information.



  45. Stan says:

    Thanks Richard. Final thought in my current quest for mpg…is there instrumentation you can suggest to measure air temp at various points “under the hood” to determine which resistor value would be best to use for average Florida driving?

  46. admin says:

    I am sorry, but I don’t know of such an instrument. That was the original purpose of the IAT sensor anyway. Besides, regardless of what you are trying to accomplish, it all will depend about 99% on “how important” is the IAT for the target ecu and that is defined in the programming it contains.


  47. Stan says:

    Thanks Richard. I am going to try a 5K resistor (1/4 watt) and see how the ECU responds in our 2002 Highlander. Thanks again, and I’ll report any significant results, as my primary motivation is mpg.

  48. mark says:

    no comment just question, have an 05 ford f-150 4.6liter bought an intake air temp sensor don’t no where to put the connector. don’t see any hard place to look for good directions or even a picture. please help!!!!!!!!!!

  49. admin says:

    Hello Mark.

    Did you buy a sensor or a sensor modification (resistor)?

    If it is a sensor, I’m not sure what you have, as the IAT sensor is embedded inside the MAF sensor, which is sold as a whole part and is located in the air filter assembly. It has a 6-wire connector.

    If it is a modification (resistor), the internal IAT is wired directly to wire #1 (gray) on the MAF sensor. It must be connected from wire #1 to wire #5 (Black/White).



  50. Covert says:

    I bought a performance mod on ebay and I did not open it but the ohm meter says 32.77K

  51. admin says:

    Hello Covert. Very high value indeed for an IAT…

    If you find anything (info, internals, performance, etc.) and wish to share it here, it would be very nice from you.

    Thanks for the info.


  52. sandra742 says:

    Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post… nice! I love your blog. ๐Ÿ™‚ Cheers! Sandra. R.

  53. conrad says:

    I like your thread and find it very interesting. I want to try the IAT mod on my 2007 Honda Accord 2.4L SE. It got IAT/MAF sensor with 5 wires, can you help identify which 2 wires (color/stripes) for IAT? Thanks in advance.

  54. admin says:

    Hello Conrad.

    In your car the IAT is wired to wire #1 and #2 and its ground is totally independent from the MAF, so you may directly wire the resistor to wires #1 and #2.

    A drawing is included below to make it easier.

    2007 Honda Accord SE 2.4L MAF / IAT sensor modification

    Thanks for reading,


  55. David says:

    I want to try the IAT mod on my 2003 Ford Focus ZTW 2.0L It got IAT/MAF sensor can you help identify which 2 wires (color/stripes) for IAT? thanks

  56. admin says:

    Sure David. My pleasure.

    In the 2003 Focus 2.0L, for both the SOHC and the DOHC models, the MAF is the same and uses the same colors. It has 6 wires. The colors are:

    1- White Violet (IAT-1)
    2- Green/Red (MAF)
    3- Black/Orange (Ground)
    4- Brown/Blue (MAF)
    5- White/Blue (MAF)
    6- Brown/White (IAT-2)

    Just disconnect (cut) wires #1 (White/Violet) and #6 (Brown/White) from the MAF and put the resistor on both wires, on the part that goes to the car computer, not the MAF (just like in the Honda picture above).

    Make sure to cover with electrical tape the wires that hang disconnected from the MAF.

    Best regards,


  57. Conrad says:

    Hello again Richard. Thanks a lot. I checked the drawing against the physical/actual and find the embossed #1(black/yellow) to #5(green/yellow). All color/stripe represented in the drawing are ok but the #s are reversed (MAF assembly is Hitachi). Will I go fo the colored wires or the #s? Best regards from Conrad

  58. admin says:

    Hello Conrad.

    Just follow the wire colors. This is the first time it happens, but I believe that numbers might have been accidentally reversed in my database.

    If the IAT is connected in the wrong end, you will notice because check engine indicator will be lit and the engine will either not be able to start or will start and run kind of rough.



  59. David says:

    Thanks for the tip on the useless resistors. I have a 1988 Lincoln Towncar with a new crate engine in it and a new transmission. (I like the car). I was thinking of plugging in a Hypertech power programmer to max the performance. Have you observed any results with these?

  60. Dalen says:

    Hi Richard,

    I was pondering the idea of purchasing one of these “performance chips” from ebay until i found a negative comment in the feedback section of one of these ebay chip sellers. It said these are fake and are a waste of money do some research on the net before buying, so I googled it and came across this page and I’m glad I did. I currently own a 2000 Cavalier z24 and installed a cone type filter on the end of the inlet tube and removed stock air box. I noticed a major gain in throttle response and power, but after a while check engine light came on. I dont have a code reader so I am assuming it may have something to do with this modification. Im thinking now the air intake is not being drawn from outside but from under the hood which is quite warm causing the IAT sensor to tell the computer to compensate for the warm temp. So i thought mabey purchasing one of the performance chips may help this problem by changing the resistance telling the computer the air is cooler thus eliminating the check engine light. Anyhow I did the experement and placed the IAT into a cup of ice cubes. Before I started the car was completely cool and the outside temp was around 7 degrees C. It read 2ohms. After placing in cup of ice for 2 minutes it climed to 2.5ohms. So I might try using a 2 or 2.5 ohm resistor and see if it helps. Thanks for posting this page I am definatly not spending $30+ on ebay for something i can buy for less than a $1 at an electronics store. I am curious to see if this does anything, as I am not sure if the 2.4l chevy engine relies only on the IAT sensor to adjust the fuel/air and timing curve. Thanks again for the info.

  61. Richard says:

    Hello Dalen. Thank you for reading the post.

    About your case, I am not sure what can be causing the check engine light to fire, but conical high flow filters like K&N are OK to use for better performance. I guess that the best thing to do is to do a vehicle scan so you be able to know what trouble codes are stored in memory, and, if they are related to the air filter in any way.

    About your IAT, as you may know, it is separated from the MAF sensor and is located at the Air Cleaner outlet duct assembly.

    About the resistance you read while submerged in cold water, maybe you were looking the x1000 scale in the multimeter, as I haven’t seen such a low resistance value for the IAT. Remember, the lower the value, the higher the temperature it represents. So 1 to 1.5 ohms is too low.

    You might check again, and compare with the following table, which is the table of values for the IAT on the 2000 Cavalier Z24, 2.4L engine.

    Thanks again and best regards,


    Temperature F (C) IAT Resistance in Ohms
    176F (80C) 315
    158F (70C) 435
    140F (60C) 580
    122F (50C) 810
    113F (45C) 940
    104F (40C) 1150 (1.15K)
    95F (35C) 1360 (1.36K)
    86F (30C) 1600 (1.6K)
    77F (25C) 2000 (2K)
    59F (15C) 3000 (3K)
    50F (10C) 3600 (3.6K)
    41F (5C) 4600 (4.6K)
    32F (0C) 5700 (5.7K)
    23F (-5C) 7400 (7.4K)
    14F (-10C) 9800 (9.8K)
  62. Jon says:

    Hey I am pretty car savy and I want to try this out on my hyundai. What is a good place to pick up a 10cent resistor? like does it matter what kind it is? and what is the ideal temp/ohms you would want? Thanks Jon.

  63. Richard says:

    Hello Jon. Thanks for reading.

    About getting the resistor, it is sold on Radio Shack and also on many online stores like AllElectronics.com, BGMicro.com, etc.

    About what resistor, it will depend on the car and model, since every temperature sensor (like the IAT, for example) has a different response. What is common in all of them, is that they are negative coefficient sensors. That is, the more of one value, the less the output. On IAT’s, the more the temperature in degrees, the less the resistance in ohms.

    Just let us know on what car you want to try it (Model and Year) and I will check if I have the information on my database. If I do, I will post it here.

    Best regards,


  64. Jon says:

    Thanks for the quick reply,

    Okay yeah I read a little further into this after I posted yesterday. I have a 2002 Hyundai Elantra GLS currently, but will be upgrading to a 2006 or 2007 Hyundai Tiburon V6 2.7L. I read about a variable resistor from a diagram above, but I am not sure how to install that correctly. Does it only connect to 1 wire from the ECU versus 2 wires if I used just a resistor?

    Thanks, Jon

  65. aura says:

    i want to ask for hyunday elantra 1995 with 1,6 Engine, what colour for IAT cable sensor ? and how .. Ohm for resistor? kind regards

  66. Richard says:

    Aura, your question was answered in the topic:


    Please refer to the above post for your answer. Thanks,


  67. Aura says:

    thanks… great forum.. fast solution, will follow again

    kind regards….

  68. James says:


    Does any one know the IAT bypass resitor values for a 2007 Mustang 4.0

  69. Richard says:

    Hello James.

    I am afraid that you will need to do the test described here to find out the resistance, since we do not have information on resistance values on most Ford IAT’s. We only have measured voltages in operation charts, depending on temperature.

    If any of the readers have the information or have done the test their selves, we will be more than grateful if you post the information here.



  70. Stone says:

    I Driving a 09 Swift sport JDM 1.6 Manual

    What is the best Risistor For My Ride ?

  71. Robin says:

    Hi admin!

    Im don’t know wich cabel im nede conectin my ressistor. Im haved Volvo 740 ’90’ And my MAF is Bosch, And im haved 5 pin on then.
    // Robin !

  72. ramy says:

    hello i have a pontiac grand am gt 2000 What is the best Risistor for my car

  73. Steveo says:

    Hi Richard, I was woundering if there was a way to trick the throttle body sensor to allow more air into the the intake manifold? and if so would a resistor work then?

  74. randy becraft says:

    I have a 2000 powerstroke 7.3 disel.While serching the web sites for info on this truck i found what was called a 10k mod…It was just as you say, a bunch of resistors connected in line a certian way.I went to Radio Shack ,got the parts and built me one of these things.Now mine is a disel and instead of hooking it to the IAT sensor, mine hooked at the ICP sensor. It’s supposed to fool the ECM into thinking that it needs more fuel than it does when you stand on it.In my case this devise worked, as my truck would not sqwall the tires at all before i put this thing on.89mph was max speed also… Now when i floor it my tires really smoke as does my exhaust with un-burned fuel.My top speed is around 105 now. MIL will flash on and off when i switch it on and floor it, and the transmission seems to shift harder. Frinds said they heard me sqwall tires as transmission shifted into second.I just know this devise improved my trucks off the line performance.I have to buy two new tires every year from showing off..Is it harmful to my engine? I’m not sure…Waste fuel? Most likley.If you own a Ford Powerstroke and want more take off performance, look up this mod in the disel forums and try it.It worked on mine and only cost me maybe $10.00 in parts at Radio Shack to build.Cheaper than the bully dog’s and banks chips but primitive compared to them also.There’s another mod like this out there that adds even more take off power also. it uses resistors with a different value.I feel that i may have gained maybe 50- 70 hp when this is switched on.Not sure though,just a guess as no dino was used.DD5

  75. Acer Rodgers says:

    Hi I have a 1990 Ford Taurus with a 3.8 V6 it also has a cold air intake, I ws wondering what should I hook the resister into, what size of resister do I need and how much horsepower do you think this will increase my car with, thanks

  76. Mic414 says:

    I installed the resistor module in a 2005 PT Cruiser and I have to tell you it did increase performance noticeably.

    You can buy this modules for 25 bucks on Ebay, and while the resistor itself may be only a few cents, it comes with a neat packaging, with a box, clamps and self-adhesive, so installation is literally 5 minutes. I would hardly consider it a ripoff, given the value of $25 vs your time.

  77. Richard says:

    Well, we don’t call it a rip-off because of the price alone, as if it would work, it would be too cheap to believe. We call rip-off to something that someone ask money for, with the promise of something that never happens.

    Anyway, you say that it worked. Did you test it on a dyno?

    I can make X-Ray eye glasses for that price and even pack it in a nice box for storage. Will you be mad of me if you buy it and find out that you can not see through clothes, even if I guarantied that with my product you would?

    Please remember that our senses response can be modified by our brain under suggestion. I am not saying that this is your case, but if anyone has a REAL scientific / technical prove, we more than welcome him / her here to show everyone the results.

    Thanks for your comments and thanks for reading. I really appreciate it.


  78. Mic414 says:

    Hi Richard, I didn’t need a dyno to tell the difference. It was quite noticeable in case of the PT Cruiser.

    You will have to agree that the IAT trick will work in some cases as it will produce a richer mix, which means more power (as long as it’s not too rich).
    I’m not saying that it will work for every car, in any circumstance. Better tuned ECU’s are probably more difficult to trick or may not improve at all because they’re tuned for high-performance already. Anyways, the PT Cruiser 2.4L engine is a pretty lazy one and the resistor did improve power output for me.

    I just thought I share my experience with others who are willing to risk $25.

  79. Richard says:

    Thanks again Mic414.

    I appreciate the info and I’m sure that those with the same car will appreciate it too.


  80. Criss says:

    Hello Richard, I was reading all this and has helped me because it was also about to buy one of these modules. Now if I could help knowing that resistance would put in my car, I have a 1998 Chevrolet Cavalier 2.2L. or show me what is the process of installation of the resistance. thanks

  81. Jon Doe says:

    Interesting read. Another thing I have been puzzling with is this…

    My 02 sensor gives feedback for the burn ratio as well- so although there may be a timing advance (if the sensor is fooled) the extra fuel would not burn, causing the 02 sensor to feed this information back, for the ECU to then respond by reducing the fuel!

    I did read that a leaner mix can be more eficient and a slightly** richer mix can give a bit more power, but with the 02 sensor working away, I cant see much advantage from the resistor idea. Also, before adding a ‘fixed’ resistor, this air temp sensor would be giving changes all the time- a fixed resistor will surely be ‘wrong’ most of the time!

  82. G. Capano says:

    Thank you for the information. It clarifies what I was thinking

  83. G. Capano says:

    So the IAT sensor is the sensor on the air filter hose going out of the vehicle (right before the air filter) on the BMW 2001 325i?

  84. Richard says:

    On the 2001 BMW 325i, it is located on the intake manifold, located on top-center of the engine. It has 2 wires on it; one is gray and the other is gray with brown.



  85. Gino Capano says:

    I can not seem to locate iat sensor. Do you have any pictures for the BMW 2001 325i?

  86. Richard says:

    The only image we have is below. It is showing the location on the intake manifold.


    2001 BMW 325i IAT Sensor Location
  87. Gino Capano says:

    That looks like inside the engine?
    Is the iat inside the engine?

  88. Richard says:

    No Gino. That is over the engine. You just need to remove the top covers, depicted with the red circle on the picture below.


    BMW 325i Engine Bay
  89. Patrick says:

    I have an eagle talon. I know the premise of this whole article other than ITS a SCAM! is that any results depend on whether or not your IAT sensor is important. now if I wanted my car to run lean then I should look for a transistor that is geared for high temps so it will not use as much fuel in the combustion chamber, right? is that how this works or do I have it backwards?

  90. Richard says:

    Hello Patrick.

    Yes, you are right, if the IAT resistor would be that important in your car, then for saving gas you should decrease resistance value in ohms to make the computer think that the temperature of the incoming air is hight.

    Best regards,


  91. art says:

    Richard, I have a 2007 cadillac dts I have a resister chip and want to try it the instruction that came with it are not clear could you tell me which wire to use With the plug off and looking into it i have the following wires
    1,tan with blue stripe, 2 tan, 3 black with white stripe, 4red with black stripe, 5 yellow

  92. Richard says:

    Hello Art.

    In your car, there is a 5 wire connector in the MAF/IAT sensor assembly. The IAT is wired to wire “D” in the list below, which is color Tangerine. Just wire the modification resistor from there to Ground, which is wire “C” (Black/White).

    A – Tangerine/Yellow
    B – Pink/Black
    C – Black/White (GND)
    D – Tangerine (IAT)
    E – Tangerine/Dark Blue

    Check the picture below for reference.

    Best regards,


    2007 Cadillac DTS IAT Modification
  93. Matt says:

    Hi Richard,

    curiousity has got the better of me!!

    Can you access the resistor values for an Opel Calibra 97 x20xev engine?


  94. aura says:

    can u give me with picture MAF wiring diagram for IAT Resistor my vauxhaull zafira 1.8 ? kind regards

  95. Richard says:

    Hello Matt and Aura. I regret I can not help right now. My database have information mostly on vehicles sold on USA. We have not information on Opel or Vauxhaull models.

    I know that Opel for example, can be identical to some GM models, but I have not the information which ones.

    If any of you have any information on a GM or any other US market model that is similar to yours, just let me know and I will be glad to let you know about the resistance values, wiring and physical location.

    Again, I am sorry I couldn’t help for now.


  96. aura says:

    Vauxhaull zafira is same for Chevrolet zafira with GM production.

  97. Matt says:

    Hi Richard.

    I thought that may be the case. Sorry for skipping over the Atlantic and invading your forum!!!

    I’m in England, the old one!, and just found your article interesting.

    Thanks for consulting your database. Maybe I should try the iced cup test.

    Thanks again.


  98. Richard says:

    Hello Matt and Aura.

    Matt, don’t worry about that. You are very welcome here.

    Well for you both, Matt and Aura, it will be a good idea to do the “iced cup” test to be more accurate, but if your vehicles have GM equivalents, this might not be right, but I am then posting a general GM IAT temperature vs Resistance range values.

    The following are the most common values on GM vehicles and in general more or less with most vehicles. Just a few differs from that.

    Wish you both the best and good luck.

    GM IAT Resistance Vs Temperature Range Values
  99. Matt says:

    Hi Folks,

    Did my iced ambient thermistor test.

    Got a result of about 4100 ohms on a digiohmeter. Now I will buy the most appropriate resitor to see if it has any empirical effect on the performance.

    Richard, any tips on attaching to the ecu IAT terminals? I haven’t got a soldering iron at present.

    Cheers for help,


    PS I will post any results I can deduce ๐Ÿ˜‰

  100. Richard says:

    Well, I guess that the table above is close to your values then.

    For alternative wiring, you may use “wire nuts” of a small enough size and doing a twist on some exposed wire and the resistor leads.

    Other very often thing used on automotive wiring are the quick taps. Both are pictured below.

    Just make sure that the connections are electrically isolated from ground (no exposed wire) and from any voltage source and also keep it away from heat as possible, as these parts are plastic and can be molten, unprotecting the connection.



    Alternative wiring accessories
  101. Matt says:

    Thanks for the comments Richard.

    Many Thanks,

  102. caddycaddy says:

    hello Im car vw caady 2008 model .Im how todo make mods.

  103. Richard says:

    Caddycaddy, I am sorry I do not have information on those models.

    If any of the reader know the answer and is so kind to share it, you are welcome. We will appreciate it.


  104. Autism Symptoms says:

    This is such a great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. I enjoy seeing websites that understand the value of providing a prime resource for free. I truly loved reading your post. Thanks!

  105. Ken says:

    Hi Richard,
    Great information!
    What colored wires on the MAF are for the IAT on a 2007 Silverado 6.0L.

  106. Richard says:

    Hello Ken.

    As per our records, for the 2007 Chevrolet Silverado 6.0L, the circuit is the picture below. Note that the IAT is directly wired to wires A (Black) and B (Tangerine). You just cut those two wires and connect the resistor to the end that goes to the ecm computer.



    2007 Chevrolet Silverado 6.0L MAF / IAT
  107. bill says:

    if you don’t take the iat out of the circuit and just install a resistor inline to make the computer c a higher resistance to think its a lower temp. This way it will work but will always c a lower temp. wouldnt that be better that totally take out of the circuit like you r saying or the chip scammers r doing.

  108. Richard says:

    Hello Bill.

    Thanks for your comments.

    If you put the resistor in series with the IAT, then yes, you are right. The resistance that the ecm will see will be always higher than it really is, plus the variation induced by the IAT with temperature oscillation.

    So if the IAT range is let’s say 100-5000 Ohms, and you put a 4700 (4.7K) resistor in series, then you will move the range up to 4800-9700 Ohms, which may be out of the circuit’s response range, making it always read a very low temperature.

    If on the other hand, you put the resistor in parallel with the IAT, it will be the opposite. The resistance will always be lower than normal, including the variation from the IAT.

    It is visually explained below:

    IAT mod serial vs parallel comparison
  109. Steve says:

    Ive got a 99 Dodge Ram with a 318 manual tranny, and cold air intake. What would you reccomend to use as the preformance chip? I was looking at the resistors on ebay as well as a throttle body spacer.


  110. UnaskUpsepNaf says:

    I just wanted to say that this site is realy special and I’m happy that i found it

    I’ve gotten exposed to quite a lot of info here and just wanted to give my 2 cents. I’m about to write a good article for this forum and I’ll publish it as soon as i complete it.

    If anybody need some help about it, please MSG me.

    Thank you.

    It’s a good thing. ๐Ÿ˜‰


  111. Kell Corum says:

    I recently bought a resistor type mod touted as a “fuel efficiency” chip and installed it on my 2009 Dodge RAM 1500. The fuel economy has improved, from 15.7 to 16.4 mpg. This is based on 5 tanks of gas with the chip installed. Any comments on “fuel efficiency” chip/resistors versus “performance” chip/resistors?

  112. chris says:

    hi im looking to fit one of these to a 2000 ford focus 1.4 engine the airflow meter has 6 wires going in to it which ones do i cut? thanks

  113. larry vanhoosier says:

    What would be the best resistor and instructions for a 1990 Toyota corolla. The reason for not trying the little box sold on ebay. Is that it never made sense until now. Think you all for this eye opening expirence. It is a wonderful thing you all have done. Thank you very much !!!

  114. Guest says:

    Hello Chris. Is it a diesel engine?

  115. Guest says:

    Hello Larry. For a 1990 Toyota Corolla the IAT is a stand alone part. It is plugged in the air filter housing and it has 2 wires, one is BROWN and the other is YELLOW with BLACK. You must cut the YELLOW/BLACK wire and put the resistor in series with the wire. You may use a 3.3K resistor (3,300 ohms) or ORANGE-ORANGE-RED-GOLD color code resistor. A 3.3K resistor will simulate an approximately 15 degrees Fahrenheit incoming air temperature. To calculate resistance from color code and instead, you may use our simple calculator below (in mobile browsers, click on “exit mobile edition” so it displays right):




  116. chris says:

    its a 1.4 petrol engine, with a six wire connecter to the air flow meter

  117. marv says:

    i bought one of those boxes for $13 pp i put it on my 96 siverado pickup. i did see one thing . the rpms at 70 were much lower than thet were before. i put mine in series .
    also getting better gas millage due the the engine running less rpms

  118. Guest says:

    Hello Marv. Thank you for your information. Better mileage is not from lower RPM. If it is real, as it must be measured by anything else than intuition, I guess that it could be because of the engine injecting less fuel. Lower RPM is typically what an ECM does to the engine when temperature is high, which could be what the resistor is making the ECM to “think”. The engine is physical and it is real. Giving it unreal values would not be much useful, at least in the long run.

    Again, thank you for sharing your experience. It is much appreciated.

  119. Dylan says:

    I have a 2006 toyota tacoma 4.0l and when i was pulling out the motor i pulled out both the crankshaft sensor and the upstream o2 sensor. I was wondering if you could send me a wiring diagram of both of them?

  120. Guest says:

    Hello Dylan. Here you will be able to download the diagram of the whole EFI system of the 2006 Toyota Tacoma 4.0L.


    Best regards,


  121. Raja says:

    Very very helpful article keep up the good work! Your a legend

  122. manthos says:

    hi man,
    i have a vw polo 9n3 1.4 16v 59kw petrol, what resistor should i use and where is the IAT placed?

  123. Liam D says:

    I have a ford focus 1.8 tddi (intercooled 90bhp). What ohm resistor would be best for mine.


  124. artak says:

    I have vw golf 4 2,0L petroland gas 115HP year 2000
    what resistor should i use and where is the IAT sensor placed?

  125. jeff says:

    on a older camaro, probably a 98, I was able to increase max horsepower by 5 horses. This was tested on a dyno at wide open throttle. It does work but I wouldnt do it.

  126. Guest says:

    Thank you for sharing Jeff.

  127. Gilberto says:

    Anyone know the values of the air flow meter for a 2006 Honda Accord

  128. Larry says:

    I have a 2001 Honda Civic. Which resistor should I use and do you have a blue print for installation?

  129. Guest says:

    Values? If you mean resistor value for the IAT sensor, in Honda cars that use Flow Meter of MAF, it will be around 2.2K (2,200 ohms) to represent a low temperature of about 30 degrees F. Please note that many Honda cars are MAP based instead of MAF based.

  130. Guest says:

    If you mean resistor value for the IAT sensor, it will be around 2.2K (2,200 ohms) to represent a low temperature of about 30 degrees F.

  131. Gilberto says:

    I put the resistor in parallel, you think it is recommended that installation?

  132. Guest says:

    Since the purpose is to increase resistance, a resistor in parallel will do the opposite, it will decrease resistance, not working for the purpose. Resistance in parallel will be lower than the lowest value of the two parts. It will work increasing resistance by either replacing the IAT by the resistor or putting it in series with the IAT, which would be simpler, as only one wire would need to be cut and then joining the two resulting wire ends to the two ends of the resistor.


  133. Marco says:

    CIao volevo sapere dove si trova il sensore IAT su peugeot 206 1.6 HDi e quale resistenza bisogna usare e in base alle resistenze di quanti gradi varia la temperatura. Grazie.

  134. Anatoli says:

    Hi Richard, I think it an excellent did You are doing for the community or people in need in general, so big Thumbs Up for You My Man!!!!!
    I have 1990 Toyota Celica 2.2 that Iam currently fully rebuilding by my self, I I have red your suggestion 4 a guy with same year Camry, so I think same can apply in my case. I have tested the sensor in heat and cold and it varies between .08 and 4.36 on the 20K mode of the Multimeter, so I recon a 4500 or 4700 Resistor will be safishiant Enaf, rite-?? But want to ask why you recommend a serious connection with the wire, to a supposed to a parallel -??. Also 100% agree with you that this mode alon will make minimum or no affect at all, so do You think that doing same to the Coolant temp sensor at the same time will help-???

  135. Guest says:

    Hello Anatoli. Thanks for commenting.

    About the resistor, it should be used in series with any of the two wires that goes to the IAT sensor to increase resistance, or replacing the IAT sensor at all. In parallel, you will decrease resistance, like air going hot.

    I have not tried with the coolant sensor. Nor sure about that one. What I have seen is people doing similar modifications to the oxygen sensor to alter the voltage value it sends to the ECM. If I remember right, voltage output of the O2 sensor varies from 0.6V to 5.0V, where the lowest = the more oxygen. Following this norm, using a resistor network, like a voltage divider, may be be used for lowering the output voltage swing, without eliminating the swing. You should also know, that this is only theoretical, as O2 sensor is only used in closed loop mode. Once you accelerate with more than 50% throttle, it will jump to open loop mode, reading then the values from the corresponding fuel table for the needed on-demand injection.

    Best regards,


  136. dave gronz says:

    OK i think you got some incorrect thinking here. If you cool the sensor down then the resistance is decreased meaning it is sensing cold air ! So the lower resistance you put in the circuit makes it think its sensing cold air . If you heat the sensor (original car part)the resistance is increased ,so putting a high resistance in the circuit will make the car think the air is hot ! You state the OPPOSITE ! Possibly to confuse the correct way to do it ?

  137. Guest says:

    Hello Dave. If we are talking about the IAT, which is a thermistor with a negative coefficient, the more the temperature, the less the resistance.

    Example, in some of the GM IAT tables:

    212F (100C) — 177 Ohms
    194F (90C) —- 241 Ohms
    158F (70C) —- 467 Ohms
    122F (50C) —- 973 Ohms
    104F (40C) —- 1459 Ohms
    86F (30C) —– 2238 Ohms
    68F (20C) —– 3520 Ohms
    50F (10C) —– 5670 Ohms

    As you can see, the more the resistance, the colder the air. You can do the experiment. Take any IAT, connect an ohmeter to it and spray component cooler spray over it or put some ice around it (without the ice touching the test leads). You will see the resistance increase ๐Ÿ™‚

    Since increasing the resistance is equivalent to colder air, then the best way to install it is in series with the circuit. Parallel installation will decrease the resistance, equivalent to hotter air.

    The idea of putting it in series instead of replacing the IAT completely, besides what is stated above, is because it will be simpler and the circuit will keep the normal voltage variations caused by temperature variations. It will be just like moving the complete range of response to higher values.

    I hope this clears the doubt.

    Best regards,


  138. Ray pearl says:

    Did I mess up ecu by taking out the egr crap.the car ran awesome with lots of power then about 8 miles later go’s into limp mode anything I can do

  139. JonJhon says:

    Hello, great information here! can you please advise on the wiring diagram for a 05 Mazda tribute 2.3L engine. the voltage coming from the iat is over 6vdc I have a p0113 code, by adding a resistor, I think I would be able to lower the voltage and temp value, making the check engine go away! please advise. thanks.

  140. JonJhon says:

    I found the diagram on line, the IAT sensor is attached to the MAF sensor. I cut the wires, went to Radio Shack, bought the 1/4W 4.7K resistor, added it to the 5vdc wire and the return wire(6.25Vdc in my case) unplugged the negative of my battery. The check engine light is gone and the car runs much better. 2005 Mazda Tribute 4cyl.

  1. December 27, 2008

    […] Vote IAT Resistor Mods vs Performance Modules vs Real Chips […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *