<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EWS Deletion Chip</title>
	<atom:link href="http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/ews-deletion-chip/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/ews-deletion-chip</link>
	<description>Technical Information Source and Discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 04:08:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: deraa</title>
		<link>http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/ews-deletion-chip/comment-page-1#comment-116835</link>
		<dc:creator>deraa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/?p=193#comment-116835</guid>
		<description>falta transponder key haomatch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>falta transponder key haomatch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel Irvine</title>
		<link>http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/ews-deletion-chip/comment-page-1#comment-116735</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel Irvine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/?p=193#comment-116735</guid>
		<description>Hey Richard,
 I have a 95 bmw 318ti and im having the same issues described I have the EWS. I was wondering if this technique would still work on my car because its not a 325i or 525i</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Richard,<br />
 I have a 95 bmw 318ti and im having the same issues described I have the EWS. I was wondering if this technique would still work on my car because its not a 325i or 525i</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/ews-deletion-chip/comment-page-1#comment-116567</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 02:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/?p=193#comment-116567</guid>
		<description>Hello Jim.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;sad though, takes a thief less than 30 seconds to steal a beemer, but a guy with the key can’t get it to start!!!!&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Sounds hilarious, but it is tragic at the same time because it is true.

I guess there are very good techs working for thiefs... or very corrupted inside employees giving out the information. I can not think of anyone else knowing the codes better than the manufacturers... just saying.

Back to the original question, the problem is that the chip is compatible only with 1994 and 1995 models.  1997 models do not have chips like this, either electronically or physically.

If you jump the two wires in the EWS module, you will only enable the crank part, but the part of the program that disable ignition will still be in the original chip programming unfortunately.

Disabling the cranking motor is only a part of the protection of the EWS system.

I am sorry I can not help, as we are not working with OBD-II models (1996 and later).

Best regards,

Richard

www.TechnicalDomain.Net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Jim.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;sad though, takes a thief less than 30 seconds to steal a beemer, but a guy with the key can’t get it to start!!!!&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Sounds hilarious, but it is tragic at the same time because it is true.</p>
<p>I guess there are very good techs working for thiefs&#8230; or very corrupted inside employees giving out the information. I can not think of anyone else knowing the codes better than the manufacturers&#8230; just saying.</p>
<p>Back to the original question, the problem is that the chip is compatible only with 1994 and 1995 models.  1997 models do not have chips like this, either electronically or physically.</p>
<p>If you jump the two wires in the EWS module, you will only enable the crank part, but the part of the program that disable ignition will still be in the original chip programming unfortunately.</p>
<p>Disabling the cranking motor is only a part of the protection of the EWS system.</p>
<p>I am sorry I can not help, as we are not working with OBD-II models (1996 and later).</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Richard</p>
<p><a href="http://www.TechnicalDomain.Net" rel="nofollow">http://www.TechnicalDomain.Net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hochhalter</title>
		<link>http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/ews-deletion-chip/comment-page-1#comment-116565</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hochhalter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 18:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/?p=193#comment-116565</guid>
		<description>I have been reading all of the posts, alot of questions answered thanks, but creates a new set of questions. like, I have a 1997 328i with ews2, I have joined the starter inhibitor wires (1&amp; 3), now it cranks, cut  EWS module wire #4 (on a silver label dme). Now, the questions, the original complaint, was the &quot;death roll&quot; of the ignition tumbler. bought a used tumbler and key, installed, and taped the original key to the antenna ring and secured under the dash. worked for about a year until the RF signal in the key died. now I am forced to buy a new key or two... and then pay to have them programmed to the ews/dme. total cost is over 200 bucks. Theft of the car is not much of a problem since the dog thinks its his...
will this chip work for the 1997 328I, and now that it cranks, i will not need to do anything else? IE send my key somewhere to get the  new &quot;chip&quot; programmed??? BTW THANKS to all who have helped in this adventure to regain control of my Bimmer. sad though, takes a thief less than 30 seconds to steal a beemer, but a guy with the key can&#039;t get it to start!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been reading all of the posts, alot of questions answered thanks, but creates a new set of questions. like, I have a 1997 328i with ews2, I have joined the starter inhibitor wires (1&amp; 3), now it cranks, cut  EWS module wire #4 (on a silver label dme). Now, the questions, the original complaint, was the &#8220;death roll&#8221; of the ignition tumbler. bought a used tumbler and key, installed, and taped the original key to the antenna ring and secured under the dash. worked for about a year until the RF signal in the key died. now I am forced to buy a new key or two&#8230; and then pay to have them programmed to the ews/dme. total cost is over 200 bucks. Theft of the car is not much of a problem since the dog thinks its his&#8230;<br />
will this chip work for the 1997 328I, and now that it cranks, i will not need to do anything else? IE send my key somewhere to get the  new &#8220;chip&#8221; programmed??? BTW THANKS to all who have helped in this adventure to regain control of my Bimmer. sad though, takes a thief less than 30 seconds to steal a beemer, but a guy with the key can&#8217;t get it to start!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/ews-deletion-chip/comment-page-1#comment-116517</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 16:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/?p=193#comment-116517</guid>
		<description>I have a 2004 325i  bmw  with no crank situation.
Do you have any suggestions on how to proceed regarding eliminating the EWS system?
thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a 2004 325i  bmw  with no crank situation.<br />
Do you have any suggestions on how to proceed regarding eliminating the EWS system?<br />
thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/ews-deletion-chip/comment-page-1#comment-115329</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 20:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/?p=193#comment-115329</guid>
		<description>Hie All 

If you cut the wires 1 and 3 do you still need to completely disconnect the EWS.
Brian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hie All </p>
<p>If you cut the wires 1 and 3 do you still need to completely disconnect the EWS.<br />
Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dustin</title>
		<link>http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/ews-deletion-chip/comment-page-1#comment-115241</link>
		<dc:creator>dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/?p=193#comment-115241</guid>
		<description>I was wondering if you put an ews delete chip for the red label dme into a silver label would you still have to cut the wires and do all that? 

I bought a used dinan chip and now my car wont start with the stock chip also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering if you put an ews delete chip for the red label dme into a silver label would you still have to cut the wires and do all that? </p>
<p>I bought a used dinan chip and now my car wont start with the stock chip also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale Kopko</title>
		<link>http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/ews-deletion-chip/comment-page-1#comment-113775</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Kopko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 23:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/?p=193#comment-113775</guid>
		<description>Can you Help I have a 1997 BMW Z3 2.8 Automatic I changed the DME now the car will crank but will not start. I did not change the EWS and I believe that’s where the problem lies. I’m not concerned about the car being protected. Thank you for this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you Help I have a 1997 BMW Z3 2.8 Automatic I changed the DME now the car will crank but will not start. I did not change the EWS and I believe that’s where the problem lies. I’m not concerned about the car being protected. Thank you for this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/ews-deletion-chip/comment-page-1#comment-112670</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 19:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/?p=193#comment-112670</guid>
		<description>Hello 

I am Marvelled with this , so that means according to Jerryvan Rosado if you cut wires 1 and 3 on the EWS you dont need the chip at all is that right Jerry .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello </p>
<p>I am Marvelled with this , so that means according to Jerryvan Rosado if you cut wires 1 and 3 on the EWS you dont need the chip at all is that right Jerry .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moshe Fusha</title>
		<link>http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/ews-deletion-chip/comment-page-1#comment-108477</link>
		<dc:creator>Moshe Fusha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 18:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/?p=193#comment-108477</guid>
		<description>Hey there! I&#039;ve been following your weblog for some time now and finally got the bravery to go ahead and give you a shout out from  Humble Texas! Just wanted to tell you keep up the excellent work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there! I&#8217;ve been following your weblog for some time now and finally got the bravery to go ahead and give you a shout out from  Humble Texas! Just wanted to tell you keep up the excellent work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/ews-deletion-chip/comment-page-1#comment-97213</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/?p=193#comment-97213</guid>
		<description>Hello Peter.

Thanks for your comments.

It all depends on many things, like any other modifications that the car may have, that are in favor of the program in the chip.  For example, a chip that increases fuel, should not be installed in a car with bigger than stock injectors, unless there are other modifications to work with that, like forced induction, etc. I know that the above is not necessarily your case, but was just an example.

The most important thing might be the tuner. If the program that the tuner made for the car is not optimized for that car, less-than-maximum gains will be obtained.

As you mentioned, you send a file to a tuner. That means that the tuner did not see your car. I am sure that bigger power gains can be obtained form a V8 engine, but the tuner must have the car present, with it hooked to a dyno and some sort of data logging while doing the changes. That way you will obtain nearly the maximum that the engine can bring, though will cost a lot more than just tuning a one-size-fits-all chip.

One-size-fits-all chips are not bad if they are well programmed, but the back draw of using them is that the power obtained will not be the maximum available, as it is not custom made to your car. The good thing of them is that again, if well programmed, gains of some sort will be obtained (better than stock) and cost will not be too high.

Best regards,

Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Peter.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments.</p>
<p>It all depends on many things, like any other modifications that the car may have, that are in favor of the program in the chip.  For example, a chip that increases fuel, should not be installed in a car with bigger than stock injectors, unless there are other modifications to work with that, like forced induction, etc. I know that the above is not necessarily your case, but was just an example.</p>
<p>The most important thing might be the tuner. If the program that the tuner made for the car is not optimized for that car, less-than-maximum gains will be obtained.</p>
<p>As you mentioned, you send a file to a tuner. That means that the tuner did not see your car. I am sure that bigger power gains can be obtained form a V8 engine, but the tuner must have the car present, with it hooked to a dyno and some sort of data logging while doing the changes. That way you will obtain nearly the maximum that the engine can bring, though will cost a lot more than just tuning a one-size-fits-all chip.</p>
<p>One-size-fits-all chips are not bad if they are well programmed, but the back draw of using them is that the power obtained will not be the maximum available, as it is not custom made to your car. The good thing of them is that again, if well programmed, gains of some sort will be obtained (better than stock) and cost will not be too high.</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/ews-deletion-chip/comment-page-1#comment-97201</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/?p=193#comment-97201</guid>
		<description>I have now installed a chip in my E34 M60B30 V8 from 1995. I had the original chip data copied and sent it to the chip-man. He could then put the original EWS code in the modified chip. Installation and start was perfect - as expected.

However - the dyno numbers show only a neglectible change in torque and power. 
Std. 228 HP and 294 Nm (meas.)
Chip 229 HP and 294 Nm (meas.)
Std. 218 HP and 290 Nm (BMW official).
It seems as if this engine is in good shape making more power than BMW claims.  
The torque curves must be concluded to be similar since the variation is only between +/- 2-4 %.
Subjectively it doesn´t feel any sharper or faster - as expected from the dyno numbers.
The rpm limit is raised to 7200 rpm which is of course a little risky - but it sounds good!

From this experience I cannot recommend to spend money on a modified chip for this engine configuration. Does anybody have different experiences or do you agree?

Best regards - Peter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have now installed a chip in my E34 M60B30 V8 from 1995. I had the original chip data copied and sent it to the chip-man. He could then put the original EWS code in the modified chip. Installation and start was perfect &#8211; as expected.</p>
<p>However &#8211; the dyno numbers show only a neglectible change in torque and power.<br />
Std. 228 HP and 294 Nm (meas.)<br />
Chip 229 HP and 294 Nm (meas.)<br />
Std. 218 HP and 290 Nm (BMW official).<br />
It seems as if this engine is in good shape making more power than BMW claims.<br />
The torque curves must be concluded to be similar since the variation is only between +/- 2-4 %.<br />
Subjectively it doesn´t feel any sharper or faster &#8211; as expected from the dyno numbers.<br />
The rpm limit is raised to 7200 rpm which is of course a little risky &#8211; but it sounds good!</p>
<p>From this experience I cannot recommend to spend money on a modified chip for this engine configuration. Does anybody have different experiences or do you agree?</p>
<p>Best regards &#8211; Peter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SystemMzda</title>
		<link>http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/ews-deletion-chip/comment-page-1#comment-97160</link>
		<dc:creator>SystemMzda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 07:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/?p=193#comment-97160</guid>
		<description>Please, leave references to Mazda theme. very need</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, leave references to Mazda theme. very need</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onlinecasino</title>
		<link>http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/ews-deletion-chip/comment-page-1#comment-97107</link>
		<dc:creator>Onlinecasino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/?p=193#comment-97107</guid>
		<description>ha, I will experiment my thought, your post bring me some good ideas, it&#039;s truly amazing, thanks.

- Norman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ha, I will experiment my thought, your post bring me some good ideas, it&#8217;s truly amazing, thanks.</p>
<p>- Norman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Lundorf</title>
		<link>http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/ews-deletion-chip/comment-page-1#comment-95576</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Lundorf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 07:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/?p=193#comment-95576</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much for the answer Richard. I will purchase the chip now and let you all know how it goes with the EWS wiring stuff.
I will take the car to the dyno later today to see std. power figures. After the new chip is hopefully succesfully installed I will make a new dyno run to see the changes.

You will hear more soon.

Peter - Denmark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for the answer Richard. I will purchase the chip now and let you all know how it goes with the EWS wiring stuff.<br />
I will take the car to the dyno later today to see std. power figures. After the new chip is hopefully succesfully installed I will make a new dyno run to see the changes.</p>
<p>You will hear more soon.</p>
<p>Peter &#8211; Denmark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/ews-deletion-chip/comment-page-1#comment-95555</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 03:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/?p=193#comment-95555</guid>
		<description>Hello Peter.

There is no silly question my friend.  The only silly question is the one that is not asked.

About the 1995 530i, it uses the same EWS system, and after checking the diagrams, it is also connected to wire #66 of the ecm, so we have not done the test, but being the same everything, it should work as in the 1995 325i/525i. The wire should also be color green.

Best regards,

Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Peter.</p>
<p>There is no silly question my friend.  The only silly question is the one that is not asked.</p>
<p>About the 1995 530i, it uses the same EWS system, and after checking the diagrams, it is also connected to wire #66 of the ecm, so we have not done the test, but being the same everything, it should work as in the 1995 325i/525i. The wire should also be color green.</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Lundorf</title>
		<link>http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/ews-deletion-chip/comment-page-1#comment-95288</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Lundorf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/?p=193#comment-95288</guid>
		<description>Hi everybody.
Thank you for some interesting input regarding EWS and installation of a modified chip.
Maybe this is a silly question since it may already have been answered but I really need to be 100 % sure before I buy and install a new chip. 
Can I install a NON EWS chip in my ´95 530i V8 wich have EWS, IF I disconnect cable number#7 on the EWS module or #66 at the ECU as described earlier in the thread?

Best regards - Peter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everybody.<br />
Thank you for some interesting input regarding EWS and installation of a modified chip.<br />
Maybe this is a silly question since it may already have been answered but I really need to be 100 % sure before I buy and install a new chip.<br />
Can I install a NON EWS chip in my ´95 530i V8 wich have EWS, IF I disconnect cable number#7 on the EWS module or #66 at the ECU as described earlier in the thread?</p>
<p>Best regards &#8211; Peter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xXmikeHepXx</title>
		<link>http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/ews-deletion-chip/comment-page-1#comment-92754</link>
		<dc:creator>xXmikeHepXx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/?p=193#comment-92754</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m trying to open forum but sometimes there are no images on it :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m trying to open forum but sometimes there are no images on it <img src='http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZodaComsroota</title>
		<link>http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/ews-deletion-chip/comment-page-1#comment-85607</link>
		<dc:creator>ZodaComsroota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 03:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/?p=193#comment-85607</guid>
		<description>Thanks for writing, I very much liked your newest post. I think you should post more frequently, you evidently have natural ability for blogging!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for writing, I very much liked your newest post. I think you should post more frequently, you evidently have natural ability for blogging!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: payday loans</title>
		<link>http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/ews-deletion-chip/comment-page-1#comment-34324</link>
		<dc:creator>payday loans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qcwo.com/technicaldomain/?p=193#comment-34324</guid>
		<description>I want to thank the blogger very much not only for this post but also for his all previous efforts. I found www.technicaldomain.net to be very interesting. I will be coming back to www.technicaldomain.net for more information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to thank the blogger very much not only for this post but also for his all previous efforts. I found <a href="http://www.technicaldomain.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.technicaldomain.net</a> to be very interesting. I will be coming back to <a href="http://www.technicaldomain.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.technicaldomain.net</a> for more information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

